No right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live. Other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined.
- US Supreme Court

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

by the way, Clinton wasn't Bush.

The first thing that grabbed me about Rev. Wright was what he said about the Clintons.

Isn't it odd that he would want to spread the narrative that the Clinton years were bad years?


Now, Obama says the same thing to his rich Republican fundraising friends.

Why would Obama want to tell rich Republicans that times were bad for Pennsylvania hicks during the Clinton years?

Is Obama out to deliberately destroy the Democratic party? I'm beginning to think maybe our "progressive" candidate really:
  • intends to privatize social security

  • intends to throw away Democratic party equality issues, including tolerance for gays and pro-choice issues

  • intends to gut the idea of universal health care

  • doesn't have a single issue that qualifies as progressive, except maybe a return to affirmative action

Obama hangs out with hateful people - terrorists, antisemitic people, black supremacists, pretty much anyone with an I-hate-America appeal is on his list. This suggests:
  • the Republicans will pull together to fight a bona fide threat to American values

  • some Democrats will join with the Republicans

  • the remaining Democrats will be revealed as willing to support a candidate known to be linked with terrorists and hate groups (which, btw, genuinely ought to give Obama's supporters some concern - what's up with that? You believe these guys really aren't linked, or do you just not care, or is that what you like about the guy, or what?)
What I see happening as a result of his candidacy is the split of the Democratic party, with idealists and angry people on one side and all the remaining Democrats on the other. One side is already attacking the other side - if you go onto the internet and look up any place with comments, you find some pretty incredible arguments:
  • The rich boys argue about whether or not working class white people "need to hear" how rotten they really are.

  • Bitter and alienated people from within the poor working class whites, on the other hand, hear it differently - they say that people really need to hear how bitter they are, because things really need to change.
Obama's comments a faux pas? I am beginning to wonder. Why do rich Republicans need to be reassured that the Clinton years were bad years for rustic Pennsylvanians?

There's a pattern - one that starts with the revelation of something outrageous, followed by Obama waffling on whether to apologize, then finally he apologizes (sort of) even as he makes additional comments reinforcing the original point.

I really don't know what's going on - but it's true: Obama really isn't politics as the Democratic party usually has done it.

No comments: