The way Obama dismisses and minimizes women's mental health as irrelevant is highly offensive to those of us who don't view women as creatures put on this planet by God to be the workhorses of the world*.Obama recently gave an interview in which he seemed to back off his broad support of abortion rights, saying, "I think it’s entirely appropriate for states to restrict or even prohibit late-term abortions as long as there is a strict, well-defined exception for the health of the mother. Now, I don’t think that ‘mental distress’ qualifies as the health of the mother. I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy." In "clarifying" his remarks, he said this:
My only point is this — historically I have been a strong believer in a women’s right to choose . . . I have consistently been saying that you have to have a health exception on many significant restrictions or bans on abortions, including late-term abortions . . . It can be defined through physical health. It can be defined by serious clinical mental health diseases. It is not just a matter of feeling blue. I don’t think that’s how pro-choice folks have interpreted it. I don’t think that’s how the courts have interpreted it and I think that’s important to emphasize and understand.I think it's probably true that there are women in the world who have abortions for what others might think are "bad" reasons -- perhaps even because they're "feeling blue." But the whole point of being pro-choice is not that you think all abortions are a great idea, it's that you don't think government should restrict access to them based on the reasons why a woman wants one.
According to ABC:
But of course we need translators to understand what Obama is really saying:The language Obama used in that response seemed to remove "mental distress" as an allowable exception justifying a post-22 week abortion.
To some observers, that would seem to go against the Supreme Court decision Doe v. Bolton -- handed down the same day as the more famous (or infamous) Roe v Wade decision legalizing abortion, though the Court said the decisions were to be "read together."
Doe holds that the health exception permitting abortion after viability should be based on a "medical judgment...exercised in the light of all factors -- physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age -- relevant to the wellbeing of the patient," as ABC News' Supreme Court reporter Jan Crawford Greenburg noted over the weekend.
So was Obama suggesting to Relevant that he disagrees with Doe?
On Saturday, after a reporter noted to Obama that he had said that mental distress shouldn't be a reason for late-term abortion, Obama clarified, "historically I have been a strong believer in a women's right to choose with her doctor, her pastor and her family...I have consistently been saying that you have to have a health exception on many significant restrictions or bans on abortions including late-term abortions. In the past there has been some fear on the part of people who, not only people who are anti-abortion, but people who may be in the middle, that that means that if a woman just doesn't feel good then that is an exception. That's never been the case."Notice the way Obama throws the words "pastor and family" in, as if he is hinting that in the future a woman will have to get a note from a (presumably Christian) pastor and another from her - husband? baby's father? - before she gets an abortion.
Can this guy seriously be getting the evangelical vote? Are evangelicals really stupid enough to fall for some guy whose "Christianity" comes from Rev. Wright's church?
___________________________________________
*Some of us view women as human beings and entitled to a little more than Milly from Seven Brides For Seven Brothers (for those who don't know their show tunes, Milly was chosen to marry cuz she is "young and strong and has lots of work left in her" - and, yes, she does fight back - even in the highly censored 1950s women didn't like being treated like beasts of burden).
No comments:
Post a Comment