No right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live. Other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined.
- US Supreme Court

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

if the truth doesn't fit the narrative, just make stuff up

It's still about the 'Wal-Mart Moms'.

I think the name "Wal-Mart Mom" is a punishment the press corps is dishing out to get back at women (PUMA women?) who refuse to get in line, shut up, and be obedient. I think we should just be blunt and say what they really mean: white trash women.

We know that this group doesn't like Obama. We know that he's inexperienced and that he's got the wrong beliefs and attitudes about issues. And yet, even though we can't prove it, we just know it's about racism too. In TIME:
"They'd like to vote for a Democrat, but they're not sure Obama is the one." The Democratic nominee has not yet made the sale with these female voters, in part because they have yet to be convinced he has the experience he needs, and also because they are more culturally conservative than he is. And there could be another factor, one that is harder for pollsters to measure. "They are more racially sensitive, honestly," than younger and more educated women, says Lake.
Do we have any evidence for that? Oh wait, we don't need evidence. When class bigots are talking about "white trash", they're allowed to just make things up.

(After all, if they had any integrity, they wouldn't be journalists. They'd be able to get honest employment as used car salesmen.)

Like most registered Democrats, if all other things were equal, I'd vote for the black guy over the white guy. That is - of course - what Geraldine Ferraro meant when she spoke of race as an advantage as well as a disadvantage. But the media is about control, and they want to control this narrative.

We must be doing something right, if it's making the journalists get all snitty.

No comments: