It's funny because as I set up a new account, on a different blog service, I have different options, for different looks, different images I can choose to represent myself. None of them are really me, if by me we mean "who I am” (whatever that is). They are host-provider options, but even if I created my own content from scratch, I'd still be defining myself largely by what I expect blog readers expect. I copy someone elses' template of what a blog looks like, just like we all copy other peoples' templates of what we all look like. We are all defined, more than we are comfortable admitting, by what is expected of us. What our readers look for in us. We know, and we don't want to disappoint.
The Democratic party has an image problem right now. My party is choosing its look, and so far it has - well, thrown out all the decent templates. Okay, so I'm stretching the analogy. The point is, we're in trouble, and the worst thing about it is, we don't seem to know who we are, or who we want to be. And I imagine we look pretty awful to those looking in from anywhere outside.
I fear the elections are gonna be a nightmare, mostly because of Sen. Obama's sleazy friends (and there are so many! and so sleazy!) and his "united by audacity" campaign, which has skidded way out of bounds.
The Rev. Wright is a bigger problem than Obama's people want to admit. He has defined our brand (our party) as anti-American. It will get worse, far worse: we've been set up to be the party of hate, the party of hatefulness. Consider:
- the party has split down the middle, with intense hostility between pro-Obama vs. pro-Clinton “camps”
- the Republicans have images not only of Rev. Wright, and Obama's other highly questionable friends and associations, but they also have images from Obama's own web site, ranging from “the New Black Panthers” to the infamous “slave shackle” blog, accusing Clinton supporters of being “house n---” and calling the former President “massa”
- a running campaign over whether the Clintons deliberately inserted race into the nomination campaign, and, if so, how much
- arguments over whether it's right to damn America
- a series of incredibly divisive comments by prominent African-Americans, ranging from Obama's “typical white person” to Alice Walker's “hereditary guilt”
- a left wing that can't seem to respect womanhood, so much so that they attack their own female candidate with gendered hate speech
- a left wing that can't seem to respect itself, so much so that the infighting is called cannibalism (and the analogy makes sense)
- a left wing with a history of preaching that hate speech is evil, attacking Rush Limbaugh and getting Don Imus fired – but supporting Randi Rhodes calling a former VP candidate and a former First Lady filthy names.
"Vote Dem, because we're just as preachy, yet just as hateful,
as any other party – we can do hypocrisy as well as the next guy."
Not much of a slogan, is it?
No comments:
Post a Comment