No right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live. Other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined.
- US Supreme Court

Saturday, June 7, 2008

before Clinton's concession

Clinton has not yet conceded. She is expected to do so tonight, and I do not know why people are so ungracious as to try to dictate to her the how and why - apparently it's just because she is the rightful nominee, because of the weakness of Obama's "backroom deal" nomination?

Anyway the pundits and, yes, even the party formerly known as Democratic, are all buzzing about what Clinton's former supporters owe the party.

It is amazing to me that not one of them is concerned with what the party owes Clinton supporters. They cannot even wait until the concession speech to talk about whether we are properly obedient and subdued yet.

Dumbest of the dumb award goes to Claire McCaskill, who probably does not mean* to be patronizing when she forgives us:
I’ve tried to make sure that everyone understood that these women have a right to feel frustrated and angry. To try to make that less than real is a huge mistake.
The more they talk, the more I find myself comparing against all those promises that if Obama were not given the nomination, his supporters would be rioting in the streets.

Was it really only two short months ago I was terrified for what would happen downticket? Now I view this party as the enemy of the very values I once believed it upheld.

_______________________________________
* correction: originally typed "probably means to be" - correct to "probably does not mean to be". (One of many typos etc corrected after the fact, but I point this one out because it does change the actual meaning.)

No comments: