No right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live. Other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined.
- US Supreme Court

Sunday, September 7, 2008

in glass houses, throwing stones

If anyone thinks I have changed positions during the time I have been writing this blog (and at some moments I have), I should explain: I am first and foremost in favor of the process itself.

If you do it right, the end result is right.

If you do it wrong, and the end result isn't wrong, that's just luck.


I really believe that.

Too bad the Democratic party doesn't. In response to Republicans violating process, Dems decided to take the easy way out - by "cheating back". I can't support that. You shouldn't either, if you care about process, because if the Dems are allowed to get away with it, there won't be any significant opposition party left in the USA - and that legitimizes what the Republicans have done.

The media collaborates, playing games with our information, manipulating us freely. Take this editorial from the LA Times:
Uh-huh. Some might call it reckless for a 72-year-old to offer the vice presidency of the United States to someone with as little national experience as Palin. The McCain campaign calls it showing independence.

Still, don't be too hard on Palin. Like McCain, she's independence-minded -- very, very independence-minded. And, it turns out, there's much more to her than you might at first have thought.

Granted, a week ago Palin -- ex-mayor of Wasilla and a runner-up for Miss Alaska -- probably couldn't have explained the difference between a G-string and the G-8, or between a demolition derby and a diplomatic demarche. But who among us can? Policy, my friends, is boring.

The Democrats will tell you to pay attention to party platforms and their endless fiscal policy and intelligence reform plans. Don't you believe those hectoring elitists!
This whole editorial is a cheap attempt at mind games. Purporting to be about one thing, it is really a lot of trying to create juxtapositions in the readers' minds - for instance, using pattern recognition tricks:
Palin/inexperience - vs - the Democrat(/experience?)

Palin/no policy-celebrity - vs - the Democrat(/policy?)
We have a right to demand better from our journalists. Wasn't Pravda a big part of what supposedly made us so much better (and better off) than the commies?

Of course, if the Democratic party had put experience first (before personality), and had made the party's platform the center of their candidacy, I would not be writing this post. (And Obama, who has no experience and who singlehandedly destroyed the party's platform in the primaries, would not be on the Democratic ticket.)

The LA Times forgets (conveniently) that the only Democrat who was ever fiscally responsible was named Clinton. And the Clintons were reviled for it - by the same faction of the party that now gives us Obama.

Yet to read this, you'd think that "post-partisan" Obama was a policy wonk, not a celebrity personality who flunked miserably when he had the chance to debate issues.

The media lies to us in ways beyond what should be allowed of so-called "professionals". Without access to reliable information - and, yes, even honest editorials - voters cannot make well-informed decisions.

No comments: